Its all very good Gawain and it would be great if France allows them to walk back in down a gangplank at Calais or landed on a beach. However what happens if France sees one of our ships coming into its 12 mile legal limit and tries to block it there does the plan cover this. I think its a good plan and watching the video its a very impressive plan obviously researched with meaningful endorsements from the military. However Reform does need a defence spokesman to work on this with Zia and Nigel on this.
Great article Gawain. It will work if combined with Reform enforcement of the Shengen agreement and taking France to the Shengen tribunal every time they allow boats to leave or refuse to have them back. It's possible to recover the millions given to France under false pretences. The other parties have nothing to say about Shengen nor do the media and that includes gbnews.I wonder why nobody will discuss Shengen.
It is impossible to disagree with a single syllable of your article, Gawain, in fact one applauds it all.
Just finished listening to Nigel & Zia - splendid presentation, logical arguments and good responses to all the questions (including even to the question from that creature representing the BBC).
Having listened to some of the decolonisation speeches from the forum in Istanbul! no wonder we are being invaded! These countries think we owe them something! Apparently we've all lied about their history, and stolen archives! Funny that as they couldn't even write. Paranoia in my opinion. However, someone is feeding lies to these people!
Im all for this as a policy, it needs to be done. The obvious point against it is, what will happen when France says no? Because we all know that's what they will do. France has taken a huge sum of money the last decade and quietly sent migrants over all the same. We know for a fact that France supports the migrants leaving, their law enforcement people have admitted as such many times. We need to prepare for a diplomatic argument which will definately happen.
Operation Isotrope was doomed to fail the moment some prat chose the name "Isotrope" for it. This betokens a complete failure - which is ongoing - to realize that this is a War - a War of Defence such as Britain has not conducted since the last time it was invaded (by the Normans). The Armed Forces seem as baffled as Civilians by the notion of defending their own country. They are always fighting on behalf of other Nations - e.g. "Poor Little Belgium" in 1914. Meantime, whilst the "Bears of LIttle Brain" in the Armed Forces die for other Nations, the real motives behind all Wars are always the same - access to Rohstoffen, or to Territory, or both. Mass Settlement by "peaceful" mass migration is a form of War (declared or not).
Of course it does help your Nation if you use military power to back up landgrabs of various kinds (direct and indirect). There are rich pickings for some, from Arms Manufacturers to Carpetbaggers - and these do trickle down to the rest of us. We the People pocket them without a murmur.
Operation Fortress has a more promising moniker, for a start. But if Democracy continues - (though Elections are normally suspended in Wartime) - the People need to wake up, and they have not yet. As Psalm 2 puts it rather trenchantly - "Quare fremuerunt gentes? Why do the Nations rage so furiously together? And why do the People imagine a vain thing?" it is the People imagining a Vain Thing that bothers me - obviously Nations are always going to rage furiously together, but why do the People go along with it? Psalm 2 provides no answer - unless you count the statement that the Lord will "bruise them with a rod of iron : and break them in pieces like a potter's vessel". Perhaps the WHY? was rhetorical .... seems sensible, why waste time wondering why?
What's the betting that we will continue to arm NATO's proxy "Poor Little" Ukraine and other dubious "Allies" in other theatres of War, without democratic debate of course - while Parliament dithers and argues and stalls and has Committees about Operation Fortress? Even if Reform get a huge majority at the next Election - there is still the "Opposition". But political parties are supposed to unite in Wartime, surely? They aren't supposed to "rage furiously together" in the same Nation, for goodness sake. Do soldiers or firefighters or ambulance crews or police officers "rage furiously together"? Of course not - they have a job to do (even if their orders have gone a bit askew on occasion).
Should there be a policy for what to do with the left when (not if) they try and interfere with the proceedings? Obviously, most is done on open waters. But they will kick off.
Over the last decade there has been only one UK policy in evidence - the enrichment of lawyers
Its all very good Gawain and it would be great if France allows them to walk back in down a gangplank at Calais or landed on a beach. However what happens if France sees one of our ships coming into its 12 mile legal limit and tries to block it there does the plan cover this. I think its a good plan and watching the video its a very impressive plan obviously researched with meaningful endorsements from the military. However Reform does need a defence spokesman to work on this with Zia and Nigel on this.
I hardly think the French will fire on a UK warship nor risk Mers-el-Kébir.
Great article Gawain. It will work if combined with Reform enforcement of the Shengen agreement and taking France to the Shengen tribunal every time they allow boats to leave or refuse to have them back. It's possible to recover the millions given to France under false pretences. The other parties have nothing to say about Shengen nor do the media and that includes gbnews.I wonder why nobody will discuss Shengen.
It is impossible to disagree with a single syllable of your article, Gawain, in fact one applauds it all.
Just finished listening to Nigel & Zia - splendid presentation, logical arguments and good responses to all the questions (including even to the question from that creature representing the BBC).
This plan will work.
Proper detailed strategy the humanitarian angle brilliant. Let's see if the trafficers start to put more children in the boats.
Absolutely brilliant Gawain.
Absolutely brilliant Gawain.
Absolutely brilliant Gawain.
Absolutely brilliant Gawain.
Whats been lacking is the will to stop the rot, the right legal approach and the guts to take the required actions.
Reform now has all three.
Here's to you Reform -
GO FOR IT - EARLIEST .......
Having listened to some of the decolonisation speeches from the forum in Istanbul! no wonder we are being invaded! These countries think we owe them something! Apparently we've all lied about their history, and stolen archives! Funny that as they couldn't even write. Paranoia in my opinion. However, someone is feeding lies to these people!
Im all for this as a policy, it needs to be done. The obvious point against it is, what will happen when France says no? Because we all know that's what they will do. France has taken a huge sum of money the last decade and quietly sent migrants over all the same. We know for a fact that France supports the migrants leaving, their law enforcement people have admitted as such many times. We need to prepare for a diplomatic argument which will definately happen.
In part we know they will say no because they are used to an HMG that always caves. Things will be different when we negotiate with a spine.
Operation Isotrope was doomed to fail the moment some prat chose the name "Isotrope" for it. This betokens a complete failure - which is ongoing - to realize that this is a War - a War of Defence such as Britain has not conducted since the last time it was invaded (by the Normans). The Armed Forces seem as baffled as Civilians by the notion of defending their own country. They are always fighting on behalf of other Nations - e.g. "Poor Little Belgium" in 1914. Meantime, whilst the "Bears of LIttle Brain" in the Armed Forces die for other Nations, the real motives behind all Wars are always the same - access to Rohstoffen, or to Territory, or both. Mass Settlement by "peaceful" mass migration is a form of War (declared or not).
Of course it does help your Nation if you use military power to back up landgrabs of various kinds (direct and indirect). There are rich pickings for some, from Arms Manufacturers to Carpetbaggers - and these do trickle down to the rest of us. We the People pocket them without a murmur.
Operation Fortress has a more promising moniker, for a start. But if Democracy continues - (though Elections are normally suspended in Wartime) - the People need to wake up, and they have not yet. As Psalm 2 puts it rather trenchantly - "Quare fremuerunt gentes? Why do the Nations rage so furiously together? And why do the People imagine a vain thing?" it is the People imagining a Vain Thing that bothers me - obviously Nations are always going to rage furiously together, but why do the People go along with it? Psalm 2 provides no answer - unless you count the statement that the Lord will "bruise them with a rod of iron : and break them in pieces like a potter's vessel". Perhaps the WHY? was rhetorical .... seems sensible, why waste time wondering why?
What's the betting that we will continue to arm NATO's proxy "Poor Little" Ukraine and other dubious "Allies" in other theatres of War, without democratic debate of course - while Parliament dithers and argues and stalls and has Committees about Operation Fortress? Even if Reform get a huge majority at the next Election - there is still the "Opposition". But political parties are supposed to unite in Wartime, surely? They aren't supposed to "rage furiously together" in the same Nation, for goodness sake. Do soldiers or firefighters or ambulance crews or police officers "rage furiously together"? Of course not - they have a job to do (even if their orders have gone a bit askew on occasion).
excellent, useful detail.
Should there be a policy for what to do with the left when (not if) they try and interfere with the proceedings? Obviously, most is done on open waters. But they will kick off.